Having come to faith in Jesus Christ at what I call the height of the Jesus Movement and the Charismatic Movement (March, '74), and having fallen in love with both the Living Word of God and the written word of God, I soon found myself at odds with most of my new Charismatic friends. My new and immature Christian brethren were clearly misinformed about what the word of God actually said about certain matters, e.g., the gift of tongues, sexual immorality, etc.. And being a "new born babe" in Christ myself, I was tentative about saying anything in way of correction to anyone unless their error was egregious. Now, 40 years later I find myself having to face the same mishandling of the word of God or worse, an apparent disdain for what is written and its preaching.
This egregious lack of love and reverence for God's written word and the preaching of that word is the direct result of what transpired during the rise of Pentecostalism and Charismaticism beginning as far back as the turn of the 20th century (*I am addressing these two groups only because of the recent experience I had with them). Feelings and opinions replaced the truth of God's word and the work of the Holy Spirit. These feelings springing up from within the flesh appeared to many as nothing less than the voice of the Spirit, "if it feels good it must be of God." The gift of discernment of spirits and common sense discernment based on the word of God went the way of the horse and buggy, rejected as archaic and no longer wanted.
This past weekend, Feb. 23, 2014, I had a conversation with a Pentecostal man (brother) over a cup of coffee where he began a low-key rant against the written word of God and the preaching of God's word. I have gone through this with this man before, hoping I could persuade him to see the error of his ways apparently to no avail. His reasoning is that while preaching is only ok it is through singing and "praise" that most people are "touched by the gospel." While I love singing hymns and spiritual songs to the Lord with the brethren as the Bible commands (Eph. 5:18ff; Col. 3:16ff), I also strongly emphasize the preaching and teaching of the word as the Bible commands (Acts 10:42; Rom. 1:15-17; 10:9-17; 2 Tim. 3:14-4:5). Singing is great for the uplifting of one another in corporate worship but is ineffective in guarding the flock of God from "savage wolves" as only the spoken word of God can do (Acts 20:28-31; 1 Pet. 5:1-4).
After our coffee talk, I and my brother gathered with a small group of folk for an evening of praise and worship. As we were preparing to leave after the service, I overheard this man talking with a Pentecostal brother about our earlier conversation. It was funny to them. The other man told a little story that he said had happened to him when this notion of singing over preaching had come up at another meeting. "I once asked a man how many sermons he had memorized or could even remember and how many songs did he know. He said he couldn't remember many sermons but he had memorized many hymns and gospel songs. I told him, that's my point." And that is supposed to be godly and spiritual reasoning? Spirit-filled Pentecostal/Charismatic men find preaching boring and a waste of time?
The conclusion drawn by these two men is that singing trumps preaching, feelings trump truth, songs memorized after much repetition (and these men know hundreds of gospel songs) trump the life-changing, life-giving and devil defeating preached word of God, and pleasing the ears of the hearers trumps preaching the uncompromised word of God. Why, according to these men (and they in fact said so), a true man of God doesn't need to prepare sermons, he can just stand up and trust the Spirit to give him a message week in, week out. That is pure irony. Apart from a working knowledge of the written word the Spirit cannot and will not give a message. Check out 2 Timothy 2:15 and 3:14-4:5.
"Preach the word!" The Holy Spirit can and does give His people spontaneous messages, at-the-moment kind of words often. But the proclamation of the word after the man of God has studied it diligently is the norm.
The danger of such error is apparent.
This egregious lack of love and reverence for God's written word and the preaching of that word is the direct result of what transpired during the rise of Pentecostalism and Charismaticism beginning as far back as the turn of the 20th century (*I am addressing these two groups only because of the recent experience I had with them). Feelings and opinions replaced the truth of God's word and the work of the Holy Spirit. These feelings springing up from within the flesh appeared to many as nothing less than the voice of the Spirit, "if it feels good it must be of God." The gift of discernment of spirits and common sense discernment based on the word of God went the way of the horse and buggy, rejected as archaic and no longer wanted.
This past weekend, Feb. 23, 2014, I had a conversation with a Pentecostal man (brother) over a cup of coffee where he began a low-key rant against the written word of God and the preaching of God's word. I have gone through this with this man before, hoping I could persuade him to see the error of his ways apparently to no avail. His reasoning is that while preaching is only ok it is through singing and "praise" that most people are "touched by the gospel." While I love singing hymns and spiritual songs to the Lord with the brethren as the Bible commands (Eph. 5:18ff; Col. 3:16ff), I also strongly emphasize the preaching and teaching of the word as the Bible commands (Acts 10:42; Rom. 1:15-17; 10:9-17; 2 Tim. 3:14-4:5). Singing is great for the uplifting of one another in corporate worship but is ineffective in guarding the flock of God from "savage wolves" as only the spoken word of God can do (Acts 20:28-31; 1 Pet. 5:1-4).
After our coffee talk, I and my brother gathered with a small group of folk for an evening of praise and worship. As we were preparing to leave after the service, I overheard this man talking with a Pentecostal brother about our earlier conversation. It was funny to them. The other man told a little story that he said had happened to him when this notion of singing over preaching had come up at another meeting. "I once asked a man how many sermons he had memorized or could even remember and how many songs did he know. He said he couldn't remember many sermons but he had memorized many hymns and gospel songs. I told him, that's my point." And that is supposed to be godly and spiritual reasoning? Spirit-filled Pentecostal/Charismatic men find preaching boring and a waste of time?
The conclusion drawn by these two men is that singing trumps preaching, feelings trump truth, songs memorized after much repetition (and these men know hundreds of gospel songs) trump the life-changing, life-giving and devil defeating preached word of God, and pleasing the ears of the hearers trumps preaching the uncompromised word of God. Why, according to these men (and they in fact said so), a true man of God doesn't need to prepare sermons, he can just stand up and trust the Spirit to give him a message week in, week out. That is pure irony. Apart from a working knowledge of the written word the Spirit cannot and will not give a message. Check out 2 Timothy 2:15 and 3:14-4:5.
"Preach the word!" The Holy Spirit can and does give His people spontaneous messages, at-the-moment kind of words often. But the proclamation of the word after the man of God has studied it diligently is the norm.
The danger of such error is apparent.